Welcome to the EAPGlass Page...





| HOME |

"Croesus Reproductions" - A Discussion


When I began collecting Croesus, reproductions soon became an issue of confusion and frustration. Opinions on what to look for in reproductions can vary among experts. Books contain vague descriptions and a few pictures, but few side-by-side comparisons. This makes it even more difficult for a beginner to learn how to find authentic pieces. Some references say the tumbler, toothpick and 4 piece table set have been reproduced. Cliff Gorham4 says the only pieces reproduced are the tumblers, toothpick and covered butter...the creamer, spooner and covered sugar have not.

This page is my attempt to provide a current compilation of references and discussions about Croesus reproductions. I cite references where appropriate. I, by no means, claim to be an expert. Here I've only tried to pull together information I have gathered and hope to stimulate more discussion and sharing of observations. I consider this page an open forum, where anyone with an observation or opinion can post a comment.

I have also included some discussion concerning use of a black light to test Croesus colored glass. This information is somewhat inconclusive at this time, as we are still gathering observations, but fun speculation none the less. We are hoping that all Croesus will take on a murky glow under black light. So far, this appears to be the case. Any observations or opinions you might have on this discussion are most welcome.


"Table of Some Common Differences"

I have created a comparison table listing known information.
Click Here to view table...
Recent Repro Alert: A repro Croesus butter dish in vaseline has recently been released. Croesus was NEVER produced in vaseline by Riverside, Beaumont or McKee. This current reproduction is made by Rosso (1998). The quality of the glass is very poor compared to authenic pieces and the finials are like those of older reproductions (see picture below of comparision of finials). It is said there were only 246 of these vaseline reproductions made.

Quest for the Black Light Test for Croesus Reproductions

As part of my attempt to ferret out the truth about Croesus reproductions, I began quizzing everyone I could collar about whether or not their Croesus took on a "pea-soup green" glow under black light. My best glass buddy, Karen McIntye, had told me that she had observed that all Riverside green glass she had tested took on this ucky glow, but other green glass did not. Now...we're not talking about an eye-popping "vaseline" type glow. This glow can be seen only in a completely dark room and is definitely there, but slight. Well...the wheels began to turn and I thought, "Here's the true test for genuine Croesus!!" But, of course it couldn't be that easy. As it turns out...maybe not. The jury is still out on this one.

All my Croesus glows...all my Riverside Empress, Ester, and X-ray glass glows...but not the later produced (1900) "Duchess" green. Why doesn't the Duchess glow...it's yet another puzzle, because Croesus was produced from 1887-1919 (Gorham, personal communication). I don't know about some of the other Riverside patterns in green, since I don't own all the different patterns.

Other greens that have been tested and do not glow are; Dugan-Maple leaf, U.S. Glass-Beaded Grape, McKee-Hickman, Northwood-Intalio, U.S. Glass-Double Dahlia with Lens, U.S. Glass-Colorado. A little surprise piece popped up in green that does glow, and glows more intensely than Riverside. It's Heisey-Fancy Loop. So far, the Fancy Loop green is the only other green I have come across that glows. If you have observations to the contrary, please let me know!

I've been asking anyone willing to take the time to talk to me about using a black light to identify old glass. There appears to be a general feeling in the antique world that if it glows, it's old. Apparently, this is not true. I've included some information I have received from some very kind folks about this subject to help dispel this myth. It still doesn't disprove my hopes for identifying genuine Croesus using a black light, however. All known reproductions will have to be tested before we'll know for sure. I know that the clear repro toothpick I have does not glow and a couple of green and amethyst reproduction pieces tested by Tom and Neila Bredehoft do not glow. Not definitive proof, but it's a start.

What others have to say...

An email from Tom Bredehoft, (www.in1era.com/SalemAntiques/)...

Thoughts on green glass that does or doesn't glow under black light. Before the formula for Emerald green (chrome oxide) was developed, you made green by mixing yellow and blue (canary/uranium) and sapphire(copper sulfate), and of course it fluoresced. After the chrome oxide development, they no longer needed uranium to make the yellow, no more florescence. But, chemistry being what it was in those days, perhaps we put just a little in to brighten the color when we got a bad batch of chrome.

U. S. Glass started making chrome green in 1898. How does this jibe with the introduction of patterns? Also in 1899, Riverside joined National Glass, and there may have been an effort to reduce costs by reducing quality of batch components. ...Tom

An email from Doug Babcock from Minnesota, www.eapg.com...
(The first part is an excerpt from a previous email to a customer)

The backlight test in and of itself is only one indicator that a piece of glass might be older vaseline. Actually, it is really only an indication that the glass contains certain compounds, one of which is uranium salts. Unfortunately, uranium salts are still being used in today's glass, so the blacklight test is NOT an absolute indicator of age. Also, it was common for broken glass, known as cullet, to be included in glass "batches" and if even a small amount of "vaseline" glass was included in a batch of green glass, the resulting items will usually glow under a blacklight. But, the blacklight "myth" seems to persist in the marketplace and everyone selling on eBay seems to think this is a true indication of age. I think you'll find the more experienced collectors discounting the blacklight test altogether and instead will buy based upon pattern, size, true color, etc.
...
As you can see, I don't put much emphasis on blacklight testing anymore, and try to rely on pattern details, color, feel, etc. There was a time in the 1940's and 1950's when uranium salts were not used much in glass, but that changed again in the 1970's and contemporary glass produced by Mosser and others will glow like the old stuff. I have seen other green EAPG glow and have some depression glass and some art glass pieces in a cased butterscotch/white that glow as well as custard and vaseline glass. So I've kind of come to the conclusion that the best thing the black light is for is to tell me when I need to dust the shelves (just kidding...). ...Doug

PLEASE...PLEASE, test your greens, Riversides, Croesus and Croesus reproductions and add your observations to the discussion list below!! Let's see if we can work this issue out once and for all. THANK YOU!!

Click here to READ-Comments About Repros
Click here to ADD-Comments About Repros

TUMBLERS
Tumblers have been reproduced by at least two different companies. Summit reproductions are marked with a "V" on the bottom and are taller and more narrow in shape than the originals. They are easy to spot. However, Mosser reproductions can be more difficult to spot and are referred to as "almost perfect" by Heacock2. I have below a pencil rub what I think is a Mosser reproduction on the left compared to an original on the right. Notice two obvious differences. First, The C-scrolls on the repro are thin compared to the plump ones on the original. Also, the curled ends of the C-scrolls are more open on the repro, while they are so tight on the original that they touch, or nearly touch, the inside edge of the scroll.

These pencil or crayon rubs of the pattern are the very best way to identify the reproductions that I have found. Just looking at the gold can be deceiving, as a genuine tumbler might look like a repro due to wear of the gold making the scrolls look much thinner than they actually are.

I have found that the scroll rubs on tumblers of all 3 colors of Croesus are virtually identical, even when there is some variation due to tumbler size, which is common in these hand pressed pieces.

TOOTHPICK HOLDERS
Below is a picture of two toothpick holders in the Croesus pattern. The reproduction in this comparision is on the right and probably pretty obvious to you. However, there are other reproductions that are considered very good and less obvious. I hope to find pictures of those and include them in this page someday. I've numbered and discussed the obvious differences.

The curls at the ends of the C-scrolls (1) are not as tight in the reproduction. This characteristic is mentioned most as the first thing to look for in a piece. (2) The repro doesn't have a flared rim like the old, giving it less of a "kettle" shape. (3) The feet of the reproduction are rough, while those of the old are clean, more graceful and detailed. (4) The scalloping along the rim on the old piece is well defined and bead-like, while that of the new is simple. (5) The length of the pressed design here below the curl of the left-hand C-scroll is longer in the old than the new. (see the comparison table for a few more differences)

BUTTER DISHES
The next picture shows the finials of two butter dishs. In the black and white picture, the one on the right is the reproduction. This picture is borrowed from Heacock's book2 which I enlarged and cropped to better show the differences. The plumes in the reproduction are more curved, especially the two edge plumes.


Other differences in the butter dishes mentioned by Heacock2 are found on rim of the bottom of the lid, which is smooth and rounded in the old and flat and sharp-edged on the new. On the butter base the scalloped edge on the old is smooth and rounded, while the new often has and extra rim of glass projecting out from the edge.

I would dearly love to expand this section with more side-by-side comparison pictures of old and new Croesus pieces. If you have pictures I could borrow, or are willing to send me your repros (I'd be willing to cover all the costs of shipping and insurance) so I can take pictures, I would be most grateful!!



1
Jenks, Luna & Reilly . 1993. Identifying Pattern Glass Reproductions. Wallace-Homestead, Chilton Book Co., Radnor, PA 19089.

2
Heacock, William. 1981. Old Pattern Glass According to Heacock, pg. 39-41. Antique Publications, Marietta, OH 45150.

3
Personal observations made by Becky Lyle, web page author, and Karen McIntyre.

4
Personal discussion with Cliff Gorham by web page author.

5
Gorham, C.W. 1995. Riverside Glass Works. Heartlights, PO Box 2962, Springfild, MO 65801.

intaglio, Northwood, northwood, EAPG, early american pattern glass, custard glass, glass collecting, glass, glass collector, pattern glass, pressed glass